Logo
Back

Why should I use a pointer rather than the object itself in C++?

Why Should You Use a Pointer Rather Than the Object Itself in C++?

In C++, choosing between storing an object directly (e.g., on the stack) versus using a pointer (and potentially allocating on the heap) has important implications for performance, memory management, and design flexibility. Below are the key reasons you might opt for pointers over direct objects, along with best practices and caveats.

1. Polymorphism and Inheritance

If you plan to use polymorphism (i.e., dynamically deciding which function to call based on the object’s actual type at runtime), you often need to store objects through base-class pointers:

class Base {
public:
    virtual void doSomething() = 0; // Pure virtual
};

class DerivedA : public Base {
public:
    void doSomething() override { /* ... */ }
};

class DerivedB : public Base {
public:
    void doSomething() override { /* ... */ }
};

void process(Base* obj) {
    obj->doSomething(); // Calls the correct Derived implementation
}
  • Why Not Store by Value?
    Storing by value can cause object slicing, where only the base portion of a derived object is copied, losing derived-specific data and behavior.
  • Pointers Enable Late Binding
    A base pointer can point to DerivedA or DerivedB interchangeably, so you can decide at runtime which derived class to instantiate.

2. Dynamic Memory Management and Lifetime Control

Storing an object on the heap via a pointer allows flexible control over its lifetime:

  • Longer Lifetime: Objects on the stack are destroyed as soon as their scope ends. Heap-allocated objects can persist beyond the scope in which they were created.
  • Manual Release or Transfer of Ownership: You can decide when (and if) to delete a heap object, or transfer ownership by moving pointers around.

Example: Creating a large data structure that must outlive the scope in which it is initially constructed.

std::vector<int>* largeVectorPtr = new std::vector<int>(1000000); 
// Use the vector, possibly pass pointer around

// Later, manually delete or wrap in a smart pointer
delete largeVectorPtr;

In modern C++, prefer smart pointers (std::unique_ptr, std::shared_ptr) to avoid memory leaks and simplify lifetime management:

auto largeVectorPtr = std::make_unique<std::vector<int>>(1000000);
// No explicit delete needed; it’s automatically deallocated when going out of scope.

3. Avoiding Expensive Copies

When passing large objects around (especially if they’re non-trivial in size and complexity), using a pointer (or reference) can improve performance because you avoid copying the entire object.

// Hypothetical large struct
struct LargeData {
    std::array<int, 1000000> data;
};

void doProcessing(const LargeData& largeObj); // Pass by const reference (pointer-like behavior internally)
  • Pointers and references allow you to pass around an address rather than copying gigabytes of data each time.
  • However, references can’t be reseated (they’re bound on initialization), while pointers can be reassigned.

4. Optionality (Object May or May Not Exist)

A pointer can be null, indicating the absence of an object. This is useful when you need a variable that may or may not point to a valid object at runtime. A direct object on the stack always exists (unless you use something like std::optional in C++17+).

Example:

Base* maybeNullptr = nullptr; // No object created

if (someCondition) {
    maybeNullptr = new DerivedA(); 
}

// ...
if (maybeNullptr) {
    // Safely use the object
}

Modern C++ also offers std::optional<T> if you’d like to avoid raw pointers for optional behavior. But historically, pointers were used frequently to express the concept of “potentially no object.”

5. Data Structures with Heterogeneous Objects

Some data structures, like certain containers or plugin systems, store objects of different derived types behind a single interface:

std::vector<std::unique_ptr<Base>> objects;
objects.push_back(std::make_unique<DerivedA>());
objects.push_back(std::make_unique<DerivedB>());

for (auto& obj : objects) {
    obj->doSomething();
}
  • Why Use Pointers Here?
    You can’t store heterogeneous derived types directly in a single std::vector<Base> by value without slicing or incurring more complexity. Using pointers (especially smart pointers) solves this elegantly.

Common Pitfalls of Using Raw Pointers

  1. Memory Leaks: Forgetting to call delete can cause leaks.
  2. Dangling Pointers: Deleting an object but still holding a pointer to it leads to undefined behavior.
  3. Complex Ownership Semantics: It can be unclear which part of the code is responsible for deleting the pointer.

Solution: Whenever possible, use smart pointers (std::unique_ptr, std::shared_ptr) to manage lifetime and clarify ownership.

When NOT to Use Pointers

  • Simple Objects: If the object is small and has a local scope, just create it by value on the stack.
  • No Polymorphism: If the class has no virtual functions and you’re not dealing with complex ownership, storing by value or reference is often simpler.
  • Performance Constraints: Heap allocations can be expensive. If you’re creating millions of objects, consider stack allocation or specialized allocators.

Why This Matters for Coding Interviews

In technical interviews, especially for mid to senior C++ roles, you’re often asked about memory management and object-oriented design. Demonstrating a solid grasp of when to use pointers vs. objects shows that you:

  • Understand object lifetimes
  • Can avoid pitfalls like slicing, memory leaks, and dangling pointers
  • Know how to use smart pointers and references effectively

If you’d like structured resources to strengthen these skills and learn more about mastering interviews, check out DesignGurus.io:

  1. Grokking the Coding Interview: Patterns for Coding Questions
    • Learn how to recognize and tackle the common coding patterns frequently tested at top tech companies.
  2. Grokking System Design Fundamentals
    • If you’re transitioning to senior or architect-level interviews, develop a solid foundation in system design.

For hands-on practice with personalized feedback, consider their Coding Mock Interviews or the comprehensive Interview Bootcamp.

Key Takeaway: Use pointers in C++ when you need polymorphism, lifetime control, optional ownership, or to avoid object slicing and costly copies. However, always be mindful of memory management. In modern C++ code, reach for smart pointers or references where appropriate to write safer, more maintainable programs.

CONTRIBUTOR
TechGrind