Database Fundamentals

0% completed

Previous
Next
Relational Vs. Non-relational Databases

Understanding various database models is fundamental to designing efficient, scalable, and robust database systems. This lesson explores the differences between relational and non-relational models.

Image

Relational Models

Introduced by E.F. Codd in 1970, the relational model organizes data into tables (also known as relations) consisting of rows and columns.

  • Tables: Each table represents an entity, with rows representing individual records and columns representing attributes of the entity.
  • Keys: Primary keys uniquely identify each record, while foreign keys establish relationships between tables.

Characteristics

  • Structured Schema: Enforces a predefined schema, ensuring data consistency and integrity.
  • ACID Compliance: Guarantees Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, and Durability for transactions.
  • SQL Support: Utilizes Structured Query Language (SQL) for data manipulation and querying.

Advantages

  • Data Integrity: Strong enforcement of data constraints ensures accuracy and reliability.
  • Flexibility in Querying: Powerful SQL capabilities allow complex queries and data manipulations.
  • Standardization: Widely adopted standards facilitate interoperability between different DBMSs.

Disadvantages

  • Scalability Limitations: Vertical scaling (enhancing a single server) can be costly and has physical limits.
  • Rigid Schema: Adapting to changing data requirements may require significant schema modifications.
  • Performance Overheads: Complex joins and transactions can lead to performance bottlenecks in large-scale applications.

Examples

  • Oracle Database
  • Microsoft SQL Server
  • MySQL
  • PostgreSQL

Non-Relational Models (NoSQL)

Non-relational databases, often referred to as NoSQL (Not Only SQL) databases, provide flexible data models designed to handle unstructured or semi-structured data, high scalability, and distributed data storage.

Types of NoSQL Databases

  1. Document Stores

    • Structure: Store data in documents, typically using JSON, BSON, or XML formats.
    • Flexibility: Schema-less design allows varying data structures within the same collection.
    • Use Cases: Content management systems, real-time analytics.
    • Examples: MongoDB, CouchDB
  2. Key-Value Stores

    • Structure: Store data as simple key-value pairs.
    • Simplicity: Highly efficient for read/write operations where the key is known.
    • Use Cases: Session management, caching, real-time data feeds.
    • Examples: Redis, Riak, Amazon DynamoDB
  3. Column-Family Stores

    • Structure: Organize data into columns grouped into families, allowing storage of large volumes of data.
    • Scalability: Designed for high write and read throughput across distributed systems.
    • Use Cases: Time-series data, big data applications.
    • Examples: Apache Cassandra, HBase
  4. Graph Databases

    • Structure: Use graph structures with nodes, edges, and properties to represent and store data.
    • Flexibility: Excellent for handling complex relationships and interconnected data.
    • Use Cases: Social networks, recommendation engines, fraud detection.
    • Examples: Neo4j, Amazon Neptune

Characteristics

  • Flexible Schema: Allows dynamic data models that can evolve with application requirements.
  • Horizontal Scalability: Easily scales out across multiple servers or clusters.
  • Eventual Consistency: Many NoSQL systems prioritize availability and partition tolerance, offering eventual consistency over strict ACID compliance.

Advantages

  • Scalability: Optimized for distributed environments, handling large-scale data efficiently.
  • Performance: Tailored for specific use cases, offering high performance for targeted operations.
  • Flexibility: Accommodates diverse and evolving data structures without significant schema changes.

Disadvantages

  • Limited Standardization: Lack of universal query languages can lead to complexity in querying and integration.
  • Eventual Consistency: May not be suitable for applications requiring immediate consistency.
  • Complexity in Transactions: Handling complex transactions and ensuring data integrity can be challenging.

Examples

  • MongoDB (Document Store)
  • Redis (Key-Value Store)
  • Cassandra (Column-Family Store)
  • Neo4j (Graph Database)

Comparison: Relational vs. Non-Relational Models

FeatureRelational DatabasesNon-Relational Databases (NoSQL)
SchemaFixed and predefinedFlexible and dynamic
ScalabilityVertical scalingHorizontal scaling
Data IntegrityStrong ACID complianceVaries; often eventual consistency
Query LanguageSQLVaries (e.g., MongoDB uses MongoQL)
Data RelationshipsComplex joins and relationshipsOptimized for specific relationship types
Use CasesTransactional systems, ERP, CRMBig data, real-time analytics, IoT
ExamplesMySQL, PostgreSQL, OracleMongoDB, Cassandra, Redis, Neo4j
Previous
Next
Mark as Completed